The fallacy of relying on tradition

[sha704fikr]

This is also one of the common fallacies when it comes to timing the water element. . The fallacy of relying on tradition and maturity. Examples of the fallacy of relying on tradition. Answer: We should innovate production processes and apply technology to improve factory efficiency responsibly. Just counting decades is enough. There is no need to change to thinking that a production process spanning decades is obviously the right thing to do or the gray situation refutes the argument for wanting to innovate and apply technology. However, traditional things are not always correct but need to be suitable for the most complete context. Statistical fallacy or statistical fallacy statistical fallacy.



It is the practice of the Water Elemental to provide false numerical statistics or, at worst, make up random numbers for the sake of demonstrating common sense and maturity. Human psychology is easily convinced by statistics. Moreover, it takes a lot of time to research to verify the degree of responsibility of truth and falsehood, so many people take advantage of this to strengthen their Job Function Email List or opinions against gray credibility. Statistical Fallacies The most obvious example of the statistical fallacy is the legendary statistic of Yale University graduates who graduated and most complete graduates set goals and put them on paper to have assets greater than the rest.






There is no water elemental intended target. This statistic is even cited in hundreds of self-help books as proof that setting goals has a huge impact on your success. In fact, Yale has never conducted such research responsibly. What is rationality? Characteristics and performance of rational people. Problems : What are the quick and effective ways to solve problems or point of view? Gray skills. How to refute fallacies. After understanding the above types and examples of fallacies, if you encounter someone telling fallacies, you can Identify the fallacy first and use the most complete steps to refute their point of view.